Your committee wants a number on AI.
The right one is the one that still holds a year from now.

For leadership teams who must say where AI will save time, how much, and at what cost. The only figures available are market averages, and none of them speaks to your company's jobs. We help you build your own, job by job.

JobPayroll officerEntering pay dataAI does itAnswering routine questionsAI drafts, you validateChecking anomaliesWith AISupporting long-term leaveStays humanChecking the AI's workNew
Example: a job and its tasks, as Skillberg reads them.
You know the scene

“How much time does AI save us?”

The question comes up at the end of the committee meeting. Finance wants an order of magnitude for next year's budget, and you know a global answer would be wrong.

According to the Anthropic Economic Index (2025), AI is used for at least a quarter of the tasks in 36% of jobs, but for three quarters of the tasks in only 4% of them. The gain is a little everywhere, total nowhere. The details in what the studies say.

What can go wrong

A figure that looks too good commits you to a gain AI won't deliver.

A market average says nothing about the jobs in your company. Announced in committee, it becomes a commitment, and you are the one who will be held to account next year.

AI doesn't replace jobs, it changes tasks. In customer service, it can sort requests and draft routine replies; calming an unhappy customer remains human work.

So the gain is calculated task by task, then added up, on assumptions everyone can read and discuss. Here is where our figures come from.

What you get

An estimate you can defend line by line.

Combined with what your teams want to hand over to AI, it becomes a deployment roadmap.

Time returned, job by job

In hours per week and in full-time equivalents: time to reassign, to devote to training or to absorb growth.

The real cost

What the job costs today, what it will cost with AI, review time included, and what implementation requires.

Dated priorities

The jobs to start with, based on the criteria you set, and a roadmap to 2030, to adjust as AI progresses.

« If banks stress-test their financial assets, who stress-tests human capital? »
Martin Vielvoye, founder of Skillberg
Frequently asked questions

What executive committees ask.

Does time freed up mean fewer positions?

Not necessarily. The same figure lets you do as much with less, or more with the same: absorb growth, review AI's work, train. That choice is built with leadership, managers and employee representatives.

What is a figure worth when a task hasn't been assessed?

Nothing, and the tool flags it. Every result shows how many tasks it rests on: what we don't know, we don't make up.

Can we compare several scenarios?

Yes. You change an assumption, and everything recalculates before your eyes. The demo shows it on a fictional company, and a pilot does it on a few jobs in your company.

Come to your next committee meeting with a figure that holds.

In 30 minutes, you tell us about your situation, we show you how the tool builds an estimate on a fictional company, and together we sketch what a pilot would produce for you.

30 minutes on video with Skillberg, no commitment. No personal data required.

Action plan · payroll teamMap the team's tasksChoose tasks to hand to AITrain two people to reviewPresent the plan to the works councilto decide together
Sources
  • Anthropic Economic Index, Handa et al., 2025 (preprint; Claude.ai usage, US data from late 2024), pp. 1-2